Abortion: The Faulty Fix

By Maria Gallagher, Legislative Director
gallagher@paprolife.org

The couple was already in their 30s when they met and married. Less than two months after the nuptials, the wife became pregnant.

It was unplanned. It would be quite late in the game before the husband, who was Maria rose picturefacing serious financial struggles, knew of the pregnancy. When the birth became imminent, they were hoping for a boy, and they planned to name him Harry, after his maternal grandfather.

The birth was quite scary. It happened in the apartment they shared, with the husband receiving delivery instructions from the doctor via telephone. The baby arrived before the ambulance did.

In recalling that day, the wife remarked that, when a woman gives birth and she is handed that baby for the first time, “It is a tremendous gift.”

Again and again, she would recall that gift, and her devotion to her first-born daughter knew no bounds.

I was the unexpected daughter.

My mother would often remark how boring she thought life would have been without her children. Both her daughters were unplanned, but they both brought her unintended joy and laughter. Upon her death, my mother’s close friend told me how very proud my mother had been of her children.

Many factors may drive a woman to an abortion center–financial trouble, a coercive boyfriend or husband, abuse, just to name a few. These problems are serious and should be dealt with. But abortion is not the fix.

A woman leaves an abortion facility just as poor as when she went in–generally, about $450 poorer. Her relationship troubles with her significant other aren’t resolved–in fact, the tension arising from the abortion, the regret, and the emotional fallout can make things worse.

What a pregnant woman in dire difficulty needs is a hand of friendship–one that will not take the “tremendous gift” that she has been given from her.

For that one, precious, unrepeatable gift has more value than the entire universe.

Whether the Supreme Court recognizes it or not.

New Threat to Life in PA — Assisted Suicide

Euthanasia is something I don’t think about too often. Maybe it’s because I’m under 30 and healthy. Maybe it’s because assisted suicide is illegal in Pennsylvania and most of the U.S.

But now that there’s a euthanasia gOldwomanroup lobbying here in Pennsylvania, I’ve been reading more about this pro-life issue.

In his book “Assisted Suicide & Euthanasia: Past and Present,” Dr. J.C. Willke wrote that the problem with assisted suicide is that it judges that human life has only relative value, not absolute value.

Just take a look at Oregon where physician-assisted suicide is legal. According to Oregon Right to Life, the top reasons people request assisted suicide are losing autonomy, decreasing participation in activities, and loss of dignity.

These are value issues. At its roots, assisted suicide pushes the idea that some lives aren’t as valuable as others – maybe because they are disabled or they can’t participate in the same activities they once did. It leads to people devaluing themselves and others.

So what can we do to reverse this trend?

When a loved one is suffering, we need to ensure that they receive the proper medical treatment and pain relief. Most of all, they need our assurance that their life is valuable – no matter what their level of ability or degree of dependency.

Learn more by listening to our half-hour podcast where our Executive Director Michael Ciccocioppo and I discuss the issue in depth. Download it here.

A Movement of Hope and Miracles

Every baby is a miracle. I’ve heard that saying many, many times, but I understand it a lot better now that I’m working in the pro-life movement.

HannahSmithStory2

Baby Hannah with her parents

Especially when I read stories about babies like Hannah.

While Hannah was still in the womb, doctors diagnosed her with Trisomy 18, a chromosomal abnormality that causes most babies to die at birth.

Doctors encouraged Hannah’s mother, Bernadette, to abort her. They said Bernadette’s seven other children would suffer while she was confined to a hospital bed with a high risk pregnancy, but she and her husband refused to kill Hannah in the womb.

Instead, they hoped and prayed. Hannah was born, not without problems, but she lived. Hannah spent a remarkable five years with her family before she died.

Her mother said, “Five beautiful years with her. I just want to tell mothers, ‘Don’t do this [abortion].’ I had to fight through it all. I wanted my baby alive and I wanted to carry her. We would have missed out on all of the beauty of life with my daughter.”

So many babies like Hannah are labeled “incompatible with life” and routinely aborted. Abortion advocates wrongly persuade these worried parents that the compassionate thing to do is have an abortion.

As I read Hannah’s story, I thought about what would have happened if she had been aborted. I thought about the parents in similar situations who do abort.

And I realized how abortion takes miracles out of the equation: no miracles for a baby diagnosed with a fatal illness, no hope for a family facing terrifying news about their baby.

Then I look at the pro-life movement, and I see the person-against-the-odds stories that we can’t help but love. I see people refusing to allow even the darkest circumstances overshadow the innate value of every human life.

It may be a simple thought, but I find comfort and joy in realizing that we are a movement of hope and miracles.

—————————-

Note: After writing this column for our newsletter, a reader contacted me with information about perinatal hospice, a program that helps families who learn that their preborn babies will not live for long. It’s a support system that is so very needed, because it helps families treasure the short time they have with their child.

According to Perinatalhospice.org, “Caregivers can provide support during pregnancy, including assisting with birth planning, making medical decisions for the baby, offering support for anticipatory grief, … helping parents create memories … and supporting families as they say goodbye.”

I encourage you to learn more by visiting Perinatalhospice.org.

Some Abortion Advocates Want to Deny Women Rights, Too

Recently, I had one of those moments when I stopped, rubbed my eyes, and tried to process the fact that what I was reading was true.

If you have heard of Peter Singer, you probably know what I mean. He is an extreme, anti-life bioethicist from Princeton University.

Earlier this summer, he spoke at the Women Deliver Conference, which was hailed as GlobeWomanan important global meeting to discuss women and girl’s human rights. Bill Gates’ wife, Melinda, also was there.

The Population Research Institute wrote a long article about the conference, but I’ll give you some brief excerpts from it:

Peter Singer, when talking about population control and the environment, said, ““It’s possible of course, that we give women reproductive choices … but that we find that the number of children that women choose to have is still such that population continues to rise in a way that causes environmental problems.”

In other words, Singer says there is a problem: Despite all the governments’ and organizations’ efforts, there are still too many babies being born; and they are hurting the environment. (Click here to learn why Singer’s theory on overpopulation is a myth.)

Here is his answer to the alleged problem: “(It is) appropriate to consider whether women’s reproductive rights are ‘fundamental’ and unalterable or whether … there can be imaginable circumstances in which you may be justified in overriding them.”

Are you rubbing your eyes now, too? Singer is saying that to control the population not only should we deny babies their right to life, but we also should be able to override women’s rights to their child and their own bodies.

Even more frightening is the fact that Singer wasn’t the only one talking like this. A representative from India put things more bluntly when she said wealthier countries in Europe and America should “force women to have less children.”

Mother Teresa predicted these evils when she said, “If a mother can kill her own child, what is left but for me to kill you and you to kill me?”

Babies have been denied their right to life in the womb. Now, global leaders are questioning women’s bodily rights, too.

Fortunately, pro-life advocates are working around the globe to restore and protect our rights from such radicals. Learn more here about our national affiliate’s work to protect human rights through the United Nations.

Euthanasia Lobby Exploits Pennsylvania Case

A Pennsylvania case has caught the eye of the euthanasia lobby.
Compassion and Choices, whose roots can be traced back to the pro-euthanasia Hemlock Society, is representing a nurse from Philadelphia who is being charged with assisting in the suicide of her 93-year-old father.

According to a Philly.com report, Joe Yourshaw was in hospice care when he asked his visiting daughter Barbara Mancini, who is a nurse, for his bottle of morphine.Gavel
A hospice nurse at the home told police that “her client had taken an overdose of morphine with the intent to commit suicide.” The hospice nurse said Mancini gave her father the morphine “at his request so that he could end his own suffering.” The hospice nurse called 911, and Yourshaw was revived at the hospital. He died four days later.

Mancini says she gave her father the medicine to help ease his pain, not to help him die.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane’s office was asked to prosecute the case because of a conflict of interest at the local court level.

“If a person beyond a reasonable doubt committed assisted suicide, justice needs to be served and the law needs to be adjudicated,” Michael Ciccocioppo, executive director of the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation, told ABC News. “But in a case like this one, which is so murky, unless there is real evidence to corroborate the charge, it’s hard to see how this would go all the way through.”

While the details of this specific case are not clear, the intentions of the euthanasia lobby are. The group is urging state Attorney General Kane to drop the case, by citing her decision not to defend a Pennsylvania law upholding traditional marriage. If the attorney general refused to defend that law, the euthanasia lobby argues she could refuse to defend the Pennsylvania ban on assisted suicide, too.

The U.S. Supreme Court decided unanimously in Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill that states have an interest in protecting their citizens from suicide, and they may ban assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Wesley Smith, an attorney and leading advocate against euthanasia, wrote about how the euthanasia lobby is twisting the court rulings to push their agenda here in the Commonwealth.

“Over 20 years of anti-euthanasia advocacy, I have come to realize that many activists on the other side care little for the truth, or indeed, facts. They just want to win!” Smith wrote on LifeNews.com.

The euthanasia lobby claims pain as a reason for legalizing assisted suicide, but studies show pain is not a leading factor in suicides.

In Oregon, where physician-assisted suicide is legal, studies show that pain is one of the last reasons people give for committing suicide. Depression – a treatable condition – “is the only factor that significantly predicts the request for death,” according to Oregon Right to Life.

Pennsylvania’s ban on assisted suicide protects vulnerable people from being pressured into committing suicide.

“One thing is for sure,” Ciccocioppo said. “People in pain have a right to relieve their pain, and we don’t have a problem with that. But the same Supreme Court decision … also upheld assisted suicide laws and the rights of the states to say it’s not legal. We stand by that to the end.”

Pro-Life Is Pro-Woman: Our Legislative Director’s Story

Today’s blog post is courtesy of Feminists for Life and our very own legislative director, Maria Gallagher. This month, Feminists for Life is publishing a series of pro-life conversion stories submitted by strong, pro-life women such as Maria.

Maria’s story begins with her ambitions in Maria rose picturejournalism and politics. Before becoming a pro-life advocate, she worked as a reporter for various online, broadcast, and print media outlets, including National Public Radio, CBS Radio, and AP Radio.

Here is her story:

When I was working as a general assignment reporter for a public radio station, if you would have told me that one day I’d serve as a pro-life lobbyist, I would have laughed.

After all, despite eleven years of Catholic education, my thinking had evolved on the issue of abortion. Having grown up in the post-Roe era, I could not imagine America without legal abortion. Without legalized abortion, wouldn’t desperate women simply self-abort? And though I never considered abortion to be a good thing, it seemed a necessary evil. And those self-described “pro-lifers”—why did they have to harass women outside abortion clinics? Weren’t they like the street preachers who screamed at passersby, proclaiming the name of Jesus while condemning all women in their path?

At one point, I imagined myself running for state representative and telling a roomful of reporters, “I am personally pro-life. I will pray every day for an end to abortion. But my political stand is pro-choice.”

But then a curious thing happened …

Read the conclusion of Maria’s story or check out more pro-life stories at Feminists for Life.

Add a Pro-Life Movie to Your Summer Watch List

What is summer without movies? This season, while your family is vacationing, why not have a movie night and watch a pro-life film?

Check out some of our favorite pics:140309

October Baby – (Rated PG-13 for thematic material) I love this heartwarming film about a teen’s quest to find her birth mother. Hannah travels on an emotional journey to discover her past in this touching new film.

Bella – (Rated PG-13 for thematic material and brief disturbing images) It’s on my to-watch list, but some of my co-workers really loved the film. Bella is a true love story about how one day in New York City changed three people forever. This movie looks at adoption in a whole new light. Winner of the 2006 Toronto Film Festival’s People Choice Award.bella_-_dvd

Horton Hears a Who  – (Rated G) I love the old cartoon version, but the feature-length movie has the same message: “A person’s a person no matter how small.” Horton’s heroic efforts are a great example to young and old alike about the value of every human life.

Amazing Grace – (Rated PG) This film is based on the true story of William Wilberforce, who worked tirelessly to outlaw the slave trade in England and restore human rights protections to blacks.

It’s a Wonderful Life  – (Rated PG) Christmas in July, anyone? This classic is often considered a Christmas movie, but it holds a timeless message about the value and impact of every single human life.

Check out more movies with pro-life themes on this list by Students for Life.

Pro-abortion Side Makes False, Misleading Statements during Political Debates

It’s been hard to miss the abortion issue in the news lately. Pro-life protections have been introduced and, in some cases, passed in Texas, North Carolina, Ohio, Wisconsin, and, yes!, here in Pennsylvania, too.

All the media attention to these new bills and laws has people discussing abortion Gavelagain. Talk is a good thing, but misleading and incorrect information is not.

Here are some misleading or incorrect things I’ve read recently online in reference to the debates:

A commenter on PolicyMic.com wrote: “None of this will stop until a case makes its way back to SCOTUS. Given the current court the most likely outcome will be to reaffirm Roe v. Wade leaving it to the states.”

Our country’s education about this infamous Supreme Court decision is poor at best. Polls show it, and this comment demonstrates it.

Roe v. Wade actually did the opposite of what the commenter says. It took the abortion decision out of states’ hands by striking down laws – both those protecting life and those allowing abortion – in all 50 states. The ruling of seven men overrode the states’ interests. In their overarching power, the judges set a new rule in place: abortion for any reason up to birth.

Thankfully, since Roe, states have been fighting to reclaim their roles in protecting life by passing legislation to help preborn babies and their mothers.

The “brochoice” campaign attempts to recruit more young men to the pro-abortion side. A headline reads, “Bro-Choice: How #HB2 Hurts Texas Men Who Like Women.”

One of the key points in the article claims that men will lose their freedom to make decisions about their family if abortion becomes more regulated. The truth is that men lost most of that freedom in Roe v. Wade. The decision denied the man’s freedom to help make choices about his preborn child by saying that abortion should be a private decision between a woman and her doctor.

Just recently I heard from a man who was desperately seeking help because his girlfriend wanted to abort their baby and he didn’t. He wanted to know what he could do to protect his child. My heart broke when I had to tell him that legally he can’t do much of anything to protect his child’s life before he/she is born.

(A side note: Our laws do make it illegal for a man (or anyone else) to force a woman to kill their child in the womb.)

“Women’s health” – Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocates are using fear-mongering tactics by making women’s health synonymous with abortion. They claim that pro-lifers are trying to sabotage “women’s health” when what they really mean is end abortion.

Columnist Jonah Goldberg pointed this out in a recent column: “But it is bizarre to suggest that women’s health and abortion rights are interchangeable. The biggest killer of women is heart disease, followed by cancer, then stroke. … And yet President Barack Obama — and nearly every other abortion-rights supporter — blithely accuses Republicans of wanting to make women’s ‘health care choices’ for them.”

A procedure that kills one human life and often damages another is not health care. And, as Goldberg says, it’s disrespectful – sexist, even – to narrow the term “women’s health care” to mean sexual reproduction “as if women were nothing more than breeders.” Women are so much more than that.

We have truth on our side. Pro-lifers don’t have to resort to manipulative word-play to sway people, but we do need to equip ourselves with the truth about Roe v. Wade, abortion, and life in the womb.

How Simple It Should Be

Politicians debate it for hours and hours. News outlets dedicate large segments of time/space to the controversy. Around the dinner table, many families avoid talking about it.

Yet, when you ask a child about a baby’s life, they make it clear how simple the abortion issue really is.girl

Our Philly Pro-Life chapter published an article in its summer newsletter with children’s thoughts about babies. We’ve republished it here with the chapter’s permission:

I asked a group a kids ages 3 to 12 to tell me something about babies and their feelings for them. This is what they said:

Trinity, Age 10 – I care for babies. I care for my baby brother Dominic. I can never leave him out of my sight. I would never want him to get hurt. I will always protect him. He can’t do anything for himself yet. That is why he needs me. If he got hurt or sick I would be very upset. I love him so much. You should treat a baby the same way you want to be treated.

Kayla,  Age 3 – I like babies to drink bottles and play with toys. I like mommies to give presents and daddies to play with babies. I would like to hold a baby and I would sing the A B C’s to make the baby feel good.

Cloey,  Age 5 – I love my baby brother. We take care of each other. Jesus wants us to be happy together. I love him so much because he is my baby brother.

DJ,  Age 12 – I think it is wrong to abort a baby because a baby is human life. Babies are cute and they need someone to take care of them. If we didn’t have babies we wouldn’t have a future.

Natalie,  Age 6 – I like babies! I like to feed them and play with them. Babies are nice and they don’t hurt people. Sometimes they bite though.

Jada,  Age 7 – I feel sad when mommies go to the doctor and kill their baby. They are only tiny and they cry in the mommies belly and move in the mommies belly. It is not fair!

This is all from the mouth of babes!!!! This is how simple it should be.

Thanks To You, No Taxpayer Funding of Abortions!

Thanks to you, it happened!

HB818Maria-Micaiah

Legislative Director Maria Gallagher and Education Director Micaiah Bilger with a copy of House Bill 818, signed by Governor Tom Corbett.

Thanks to you, Pennsylvania taxpayers will not have to pay for abortions under the health insurance exchange created by the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

House Bill 818, which became law as Act 13, ensures that Pennsylvania opts out of elective abortion coverage in the state health insurance exchange created through Obamacare.

Our team worked round the clock to ensure that you and your family would not be forced to pay for the expansion of abortion in the Commonwealth.

Lives will be saved, mothers will be empowered, and your hard-earned tax dollars will be safeguarded as a result of this remarkable legislative achievement.

Please join us as we work to make the next miracle happen. Donate today or volunteer with a pro-life chapter in your area!